What are some indicators to look for if our workforce has become too lean after our company went through a workforce reduction two years ago? Last year we had an additional 27 people exit the company voluntarily. What signs should we look for to indicate the employees are overworked and stressed out? —Not Enough Cooks, administrative assistant, utilities, Giddings, Texas | |||||||||||||||||||
There are three reliable sources of information that can indicate how employees are managing with workload. First, there are behavioral indicators. Are more people taking sick leave now compared with pre-reduction? Are there more complaints, more team conflict? Is the loss of 27 employees higher than your previous turnover rate? What's the conversation like in the break room—or do employees no longer have the opportunities to mix and chat? Are employees routinely working longer hours and weekends? Have leave applications slowed down? Have customer complaints increased? To support these behavioral observations, your organization ideally would gather empirical data from former and/or current employees. Employees who have decided to leave can provide reliable information about the impact of workload. Implement an effective exit interview process to enable the organization to understand the true causes of loss. For example, of the 27 who left last year, how many did so for reasons that your organization could have influenced? If those resignations reasons relate to overwork, then conduct a cost comparison: How much does it cost to replace staff and retrain new people to full productivity compared with how much it costs to reduce workload pressures through various means? For example, let's presume the breakdown of the 27 people as follows:
To replace eight employees with an average salary of $60,000 (using a conservative 30 percent of salary as replacement cost) would equal $144,000—some of which should be reallocated to fund workload reductions through, for example, additional staff, additional skills or improved processes. The third source of reliable information comes from current employees. Only if your organization is prepared to address overwork issues should you approach current employees to ask about their experiences of life at work. Conduct a survey with a sample of staff and explore what people consider to be great (and not so great) about working at your company—and how they would change it if they could. Employees will identify means of reducing workload other than just employing more people. Workflow improvements, removing red tape, skills improvements—a range of simple solutions can emerge from asking staff questions about improving life at work. If you currently believe there may be an adverse reaction to workload pressures, then proactively gathering information "from the horse's mouth" can reduce the future risk of losing staff and represents a sound risk management strategy. SOURCE: Lisa Halloran, Sydney, Australia |
熱門文章
-
中国ブランド構築の難しさ ~景徳鎮はなぜ衰退したのか 凋落著しい景徳鎮 景徳鎮という地名はほとんどの人が聞いたことがあるだろう。 私は焼き物に凝るというほどではないが、見るのは結構好きで、大阪市東洋陶磁美術館の安宅コレクションに収蔵されている明代の景徳鎮の作品などを日本でも...
-
從前有一個國家,地不大,人不多,但是人民過著悠閒快樂的生活,因為他們有一位不喜歡做事的國王和一位不喜歡做官的宰相。 國王沒有什麼不良嗜好,除了打獵以外,最喜歡與宰相微服私訪民隱。宰相除了處理國務以外,就是陪著國王下鄉巡視,如果是他一個人的話,最喜歡研究宇宙人生的真理,他最常掛在嘴...
-
(文/劉典嚴) 企管顧問邦納保(Eric Bonabeau)和梅耶(Christopher Meyer)在《哈佛商業評論》上分析,觀察螞蟻和蜜蜂的行徑,可以學到不少通路管理課程。舉例來說,螞蟻總能找出最短的路途,把食物搬回家。 當發現食物時,兩隻螞蟻若同時離開巢穴,較快扛回食物者...